This play is about a foolishly idealistic aristocrat who is deceived by a spy woman during the war between Britain and Germany. The play gradually unfolds how the blind stupidity of Augustus becomes ineffective when confronting pain and reality.
The main character, Augustus, is a naive and somewhat oblivious man who is caught up in the bureaucratic machinery of wartime efforts. The play satirizes the inefficiency and hypocrisy of government systems, showing how individuals are often swept up in situations that they do not fully understand. Augustus's attempts to "do his bit" for the war effort highlight the contrast between his good intentions and the reality of the world around him.
Through humor and satire, Shaw critiques the way war and duty are portrayed, as well as the misguided actions of those in power. The play is a commentary on the disconnection between the ruling class and the general public, as well as the absurdities inherent in the systems of government and war.
The plot revolves around Lord Augustus Highcastle, a dim-witted aristocrat who possesses a secret document containing a list of British guns and their emplacements. A female spy outwits Augustus and steals the document from him. Augustus is ultimately exposed as incompetent, and the play ends with him realizing that he has been tricked.
Summary of the Play
Augustus Does His Bit is a short comic play written by George Bernard Shaw during World War I. It is a satire that makes fun of government officials and the way they handle serious matters like war. The play is set in a town hall office in England during the war, and the main character is Lord Augustus Highcastle, a proud and self-important nobleman who believes he is doing something very important for the country.
Lord Augustus thinks he is playing a big role in the war effort by handling secret documents and attending meetings. He is full of pride and sees himself as clever and valuable to the government. However, Shaw shows us that Augustus is actually foolish, unaware, and not very smart. He does not realize how little he understands about what is going on around him.
The story takes a turn when a mysterious and attractive lady visits Lord Augustus. She acts friendly and respectful toward him, which makes Augustus feel even more important. She tricks him into talking about a secret document that contains the names of British agents. Without realizing it, Augustus gives her enough information to get the document from him.
Later, when it becomes clear that the document is missing, Lord Augustus panics. He finally realizes that he has been fooled by a spy. However, instead of taking full responsibility for his mistake, he tries to blame others and protect his reputation. The play ends by showing that the woman was far more intelligent and capable than Augustus, and that he was not as important or wise as he believed.
The main message of the play is that many people in power during wartime are not as smart or helpful as they think they are. Shaw uses humor to show how proud and clueless some officials can be. He also points out that real intelligence and skill do not always come from those with titles and high positions.
The play criticizes the British upper class and the way the government handles war. Shaw suggests that people like Lord Augustus are more concerned with their image and titles than actually doing something useful. Through the clever female character, Shaw also shows that women, who were often underestimated at that time, could be smarter and more effective than powerful men.
In conclusion, Augustus Does His Bit is a funny but sharp look at the foolishness of people in power and the flaws in government systems. Shaw uses simple scenes and smart dialogue to reveal big truths about pride, responsibility, and the real meaning of doing one’s duty in times of war.
Interpretation
Augustus Does His Bit by George Bernard Shaw is a satirical exploration of the themes of duty, war, and the absurdities of government systems, especially during times of crisis like World War I. Through the comedic lens of the main character, Augustus, Shaw invites the audience to reflect on the nature of patriotism, the blind acceptance of authority, and the role of the individual in the larger societal machinery.
Critique of Bureaucracy and Government Incompetence
At its core, the play critiques the bureaucratic systems that govern people's lives, especially in times of war. Augustus, an ordinary man, is thrust into the war effort without any real understanding of what he is supposed to do. He becomes a pawn in a larger political game, showing how individuals are often swept along by events beyond their control. The government's role in pushing people into action, regardless of their capabilities or understanding, highlights the inefficiencies and absurdities of the system. Shaw points out that these systems are more about maintaining appearances and following formalities than actually achieving meaningful goals.
Satire of War and Patriotism
The play also uses humor to expose the empty rhetoric surrounding war and national duty. Augustus, despite his good intentions, struggles to comprehend the purpose of his involvement. This reflects Shaw’s view that many people blindly accept the notion of patriotism and duty without ever questioning the motivations behind war or the real impact it has on individuals. Shaw mocks the idea of "doing your bit" as a patriotic duty, showing how it can often be a hollow concept used to manipulate people into participating in a cause that they may not fully understand or support.
The Absurdity of Blind Obedience
Through Augustus's experience, Shaw portrays the dangers of blind obedience to authority. Augustus is eager to contribute to the war effort, but he is misguided by those in charge who don’t seem to care about his personal needs or understanding. His confusion and inability to navigate the system underscore the ridiculousness of blindly following orders without considering the individual’s role in the larger scheme. Shaw uses this to question the wisdom of unquestioning loyalty to a cause, especially when the leadership itself is flawed or misguided.
The Disconnect Between Leaders and Common People
The play also highlights the disconnect between the leaders and the common people. Those in positions of power, including government officials, are portrayed as out of touch with the real concerns and lives of ordinary citizens. They are more concerned with their own reputations and maintaining control than actually addressing the needs of the people they govern. Augustus’s innocent desire to help contrasts sharply with the self-serving and bureaucratic attitudes of those in power, revealing the ways in which power structures often fail to serve the public good.
The Absurdity of the War Effort
Finally, Shaw uses humor to underline the absurdities of war itself. Augustus, a man who is largely uninvolved in politics, is caught up in the chaos of wartime bureaucracy and becomes a symbol of the ordinary person who is manipulated by larger forces. Through Augustus’s interactions with the authorities and the ridiculous situations he finds himself in, Shaw reveals the senselessness and absurdity of war. It is not about glory or heroism but a series of convoluted and often comical events that leave ordinary people bewildered and disillusioned.
Conclusion
In summary, Augustus Does His Bit is a sharp critique of war, bureaucracy, and blind obedience to authority. Shaw uses humor and satire to question the validity of societal norms surrounding patriotism, duty, and government, particularly in times of war. By presenting the experiences of Augustus, a well-meaning but naive character, Shaw exposes the absurdities of a system that manipulates individuals for the sake of appearances, leaving them confused and disillusioned. Through this, the play urges the audience to critically evaluate their roles in society and the motivations behind the systems they are a part of.
Understanding
1. At the beginning, the clerk seems to be incompetent. How? Is he really incompetent?
At the beginning of Augustus Does His Bit, the clerk appears incompetent because he struggles to explain clearly to Augustus what his duties are, and he seems disorganized in managing the paperwork related to his enlistment. However, the clerk's apparent incompetence may actually be a reflection of the larger, absurd bureaucracy he is part of rather than personal ineptitude. He is simply a cog in a confusing and inefficient system, so while he seems incompetent, his behaviour highlights the dysfunction of the bureaucratic machinery rather than his own lack of ability.
2. Was Augustus's speech in Little Pifflington successful? What does the clerk think about it? What does Augustus himself think about its effect on the people of the town? Do you think it was a great speech? Why?
No, Augustus’s speech in Little Pifflington was not successful. The clerk, who is part of the audience, believes the speech was ineffective and lacks impact, thinking it failed to inspire the crowd. Augustus himself, however, thinks that the speech had a strong effect on the people and believes it inspired them. However, in reality, the speech is comically naive and lacks substance, making it more of a humorous failure than a great oratory. It wasn’t a great speech because it lacked depth, clarity, and real engagement with the audience.
3. What measures has Augustus taken to enforce war saving? What is the clerk's response to them?
Augustus has taken measures to enforce war savings by encouraging the people of Little Pifflington to buy war bonds and contribute to national savings efforts. He also attempts to collect donations and raise funds for the war. The clerk, however, responds skeptically and points out the absurdity of Augustus's efforts, revealing that Augustus lacks a proper understanding of how the system works and that his actions are ineffective in achieving any real impact.
4. What power does the clerk think war brings out in a person?
5. What is the significance of the sweeping of the streets?
The sweeping of the streets in Augustus Does His Bit symbolizes the meaningless and superficial efforts people are often encouraged to make during wartime, giving the illusion of contribution without having any real impact. It highlights the way individuals are made to feel involved in the war effort through trivial tasks rather than addressing more substantial issues. The act of sweeping is both a literal and figurative "cleaning up" that doesn't change the larger, more complex realities of the situation, emphasizing the futility of these efforts in the face of greater political and social challenges.
6. Augustus and the clerk have different opinions about the gas stove. What aspect of government functioning is displayed by the contradiction in orders?
The contradiction in orders about the gas stove highlights the inefficiency and confusion within government functioning. It reflects poor communication, lack of coordination, and the tendency of bureaucratic systems to issue conflicting directives. This showcases how government operations can be disorganized, with different officials giving contradictory instructions, leading to confusion and inefficiency in administration.
7. Is, according to Augustus and Beamish, the clerk's request for a pay rise untimely?
Yes, according to Augustus and Beamish, the clerk’s request for a pay rise is untimely. They believe that during wartime, personal financial concerns should be set aside in favor of national duty and sacrifice. They see the request as inappropriate and selfish, as it contrasts with the spirit of war efforts and austerity measures being promoted.
8. What is Augustus's idea of secrecy in war?
Augustus’s idea of secrecy in war is superficial and misguided. He believes that maintaining secrecy means strictly controlling information and ensuring that classified details do not fall into the wrong hands. However, he is naive and overestimates his own importance, failing to realize that real spying operates in more subtle and intelligent ways. His exaggerated sense of secrecy ultimately makes him an easy target for manipulation, highlighting Shaw’s satire on the inefficiency of bureaucratic officials in wartime intelligence.
9. What is Augustus's relationship with the lady?
Augustus initially sees the lady as a harmless admirer who flatters his ego. He is eager to impress her, believing she respects his importance and intelligence. However, in reality, the lady is a clever spy who manipulates Augustus into revealing confidential information. Their relationship is one-sided: while Augustus thinks he is in control, she outsmarts him, exposing his naivety and making a mockery of his self-importance.
10. How does Augustus hope to outwit the female spy? How is he himself outwitted?
Augustus hopes to outwit the female spy by pretending to be cautious and secretive, believing that his strict adherence to wartime security measures will prevent any classified information from being leaked. He assumes that by acting important and refusing to share details, he can outsmart her.
However, he is outwitted because the lady skillfully manipulates his vanity and arrogance. She flatters him, pretends to admire his intelligence, and cleverly tricks him into revealing sensitive information without him realizing it. Augustus, blinded by his own self-importance, fails to see that he has been completely deceived until it is too late, making him a comic example of bureaucratic incompetence.
11. What is Augustus's estimate about the German War Office?
Augustus believes that the German War Office operates with the same inefficiency and bureaucratic incompetence as the British system. He assumes that their intelligence network is disorganized and that they struggle with the same kind of administrative blunders he sees in his own government. This underestimation reflects his arrogance and naivety, as he fails to recognize the effectiveness of enemy spying — ironically, while he is making this assumption, he himself is being successfully deceived by a spy.
12. Is Augustus reliable? Consider this point with reference to the secret list.
No, Augustus is not reliable, especially in matters of secrecy. Regarding the secret list, he is entrusted with sensitive information, but his arrogance and lack of awareness make him an easy target for deception. He prides himself on being cautious and important, yet he is easily manipulated by the female spy, who tricks him into revealing the contents of the list. This incident proves that Augustus is not only unreliable but also dangerously naive, highlighting Shaw’s satire on incompetent bureaucrats in positions of responsibility.
13. How would you describe Augustus's character?
Augustus is an arrogant, self-important, and naive bureaucrat who overestimates his intelligence and influence. He takes great pride in his official position and believes himself to be a key figure in the war effort, despite his limited understanding of real military strategy or intelligence. He is easily flattered and manipulated, which leads to his downfall when a clever female spy deceives him. His character serves as a satire of inefficient government officials who are more concerned with their own status than with actual competence.
Rhetoric?Language/Writing
1. What does Augustus's posture at the beginning of the play suggest about his attitude to work? Why does he change his posture when he sees the elderly clerk?
At the beginning of the play, Augustus is lounging comfortably with an air of self-importance, suggesting that he sees his work as tedious and beneath him. His relaxed posture indicates laziness, arrogance, and a lack of real dedication to his duties.
However, when he sees the elderly clerk, he quickly changes his posture, sitting up to appear more authoritative and diligent. This shift shows his desire to maintain the illusion of being a responsible and hardworking official, even though he is more concerned with appearances than with actual efficiency.
2. Why does the clerk think that the country is going to the dogs? Is his reaction proper? How does Augustus react to the clerk's observation, and does the observation suit "a distinguished member of the governing class"?
The clerk thinks that the country is "going to the dogs" because he perceives a decline in competence, responsibility, and proper governance, likely due to the inefficiencies and contradictions he observes in the bureaucracy and the war effort. He feels disillusioned by the lack of effectiveness in the system.
His reaction is somewhat proper in that it reflects the frustration many people feel with an incompetent government, but it is also exaggerated and cynical. Instead of offering solutions, the clerk resigns to the idea that the country is doomed.
Augustus reacts to the clerk's observation by dismissing it and continuing to focus on his own importance and duties. He does not seem to fully understand or appreciate the clerk's criticism, being more concerned with maintaining his role in the system. The observation doesn't quite suit "a distinguished member of the governing class" because it comes from someone who, instead of trying to improve the system, simply laments its failures. It reflects the frustration of an individual who is part of the bureaucracy but lacks the authority or insight to enact real change.
3. What is ironic about Augustus's encounter at Hulluch?
The irony of Augustus’s encounter at Hulluch lies in the fact that, despite his inflated sense of importance and belief that he is playing a critical role in the war effort, he ends up completely out of his depth and ineffective. Augustus, who is eager to be seen as a key figure in the war, is sent to Hulluch, but instead of being involved in anything important, he becomes embroiled in a series of ridiculous misunderstandings. His encounter exposes his incompetence and highlights the absurdity of his self-perception — he thinks he is contributing significantly, yet his actions and presence at Hulluch have no real impact, underlining the gap between his belief in his own importance and the reality of his situation.
4. What is Augustus's attitude to his German brothers-in-law? How does it affect the course of the play?
Augustus's attitude toward his German brothers-in-law is one of naive friendliness and misplaced loyalty. He views them as harmless and is willing to overlook their potential as spies, partly because of his desire to maintain a positive personal relationship with them. His attitude reflects his lack of understanding of the seriousness of wartime espionage and the complexities of loyalty and betrayal during the war.
This attitude affects the course of the play by leading Augustus into a dangerous situation where he unknowingly compromises national security. His blind trust in his brothers-in-law allows the spy network to manipulate him, leading to him being outwitted. It underscores his general incompetence and naivety, which are key elements in the play's satire of bureaucratic inefficiency and the absurdity of the war effort.
5. Enumerate some of the instances of the unexpected.
Some instances of the unexpected in Augustus Does His Bit include:
a) The clerk's incompetence: While Augustus expects the clerk to be knowledgeable and efficient, the clerk turns out to be disorganized and ineffective.
b) Augustus’s success as a public speaker: Augustus believes his speech will inspire the townspeople, but it falls flat and achieves the opposite effect, highlighting his naivety.
c) The gas stove mix-up: Augustus's attempt to follow government orders about the gas stove ends in confusion, showing how government instructions can be contradictory and lead to unexpected problems.
d) The German
brothers-in-law: Augustus naively trusts his German relatives, who turn out to
be spies, revealing his lack of awareness and understanding of espionage.
These instances highlight the play's themes of absurdity, miscommunication, and the unexpected outcomes of well-meaning actions.
6. Augustus says, "I am ever at my country's call." Explain. Is he satisfied with his present status and his real aspirations?
When Augustus says, "I am ever at my country's call," he is expressing a patriotic sentiment, suggesting that he is always ready to serve and contribute to the war effort. However, this statement is more about his desire to appear noble and important than a reflection of genuine selflessness.
In reality, Augustus is not truly satisfied with his current status. He seeks recognition and a sense of significance, often exaggerating his role in the war effort. His real aspirations are driven by vanity and a desire for status rather than actual dedication to his country's cause. He wants to be seen as a distinguished figure, but his actions reveal that he is more concerned with personal glory than with making any meaningful contribution. His idealized self-image contrasts with the reality of his ineffectiveness, highlighting his self-deception and naivety.
7. What do you think is Augustus's attitude to war? What about the clerk's? Who does the playwright covertly identify with? Why?
Augustus's attitude to war is largely superficial and self-serving. He views war as an opportunity to gain importance, recognition, and a sense of duty, but his understanding of its true complexities is minimal. He is more focused on appearing patriotic and fulfilling his role in the war effort for personal glory than actually contributing meaningfully. His attitude reflects naivety and a lack of real engagement with the reality of war.
The clerk, on the other hand, is more cynical and disillusioned about the war. He is critical of the inefficiency and incompetence of the government’s handling of the war and feels that the country is "going to the dogs." The clerk’s attitude is one of frustration with the bureaucracy and the futility of the efforts being made, suggesting that he has a more realistic, though bleak, view of the situation.
The playwright, George Bernard Shaw, covertly identifies with the clerk's perspective. Shaw, known for his social and political critiques, often used his plays to comment on the absurdities of war, bureaucracy, and governmental inefficiency. Like the clerk, Shaw likely saw through the romanticized notions of patriotism and duty and was more concerned with the failures of authority and the hypocrisy in the war effort. Through the clerk’s disillusionment and skepticism, Shaw aligns himself with the voice of reason, critical of blind obedience and government incompetence.
8. How does the play satarize the British upper class?
The play satirizes the British upper class by highlighting their incompetence, superficiality, and disconnect from the realities of war. Characters like Augustus, who believe they are performing noble duties, are shown to be self-serving and ineffective. Their inflated sense of importance and reliance on appearances, rather than actual knowledge or contribution, mocks the upper class’s tendency to focus on status and image while failing to address real issues. Through absurd situations and characters, Shaw critiques the misguided priorities and lack of genuine responsibility in the British ruling class.
9. Is this play a comedy or farce? Why?
Augustus Does His Bit is primarily a comedy with elements of farce. It uses humor to satirize war, bureaucracy, and the incompetence of individuals in power, particularly the British upper class. The situations are exaggerated and absurd, and the characters' misunderstandings and missteps create humorous and ridiculous outcomes, which align it with the farcical genre. However, it also includes thoughtful social commentary, making it more than just a simple farce.
10. How does Augustus's defense of war become a defense of drinking?
Augustus's defense of war becomes a defense of drinking when he compares the need for war to the need for alcohol. He argues that just as people drink for pleasure and to relieve stress, war is necessary for the country's "health" and should be accepted as a normal part of life. This analogy satirizes the way some people blindly justify destructive or harmful behaviors, suggesting that both war and drinking are accepted without questioning their true costs or consequences.
Discussion
1. Discuss "Augustus Does His Bit" as an anti-war play.
Augustus Does His Bit is an anti-war play that critiques the absurdities and inefficiencies of war through humor and satire. It exposes the naïveté and incompetence of individuals caught up in the war effort, particularly those in positions of power, like Augustus. The play mocks the glorification of war and the false sense of patriotism that drives people to blindly follow orders, while also highlighting the disconnection between the ruling class and the common people. By using absurd situations and characters, Shaw illustrates the futility and destructive nature of war, making the play a sharp critique of the nationalistic fervor that fuels it.
2. Is the play an indictment of human nature for romanticizing war?
Yes, Augustus Does His Bit can be seen as an indictment of human nature for romanticizing war. Through the character of Augustus, who naively views war as a noble cause that will bring glory and recognition, Shaw critiques the idealized and superficial perceptions of war held by society. The play exposes the absurdity of such romantic notions by showing the incompetence, confusion, and futility surrounding the war effort, ultimately highlighting how people blindly embrace the idea of war without understanding its true consequences. Shaw uses humor and satire to argue against the glorification of war and challenge the societal tendency to romanticize it.
3. The clash between Augustus and Beamish is between the idealistic and the realistic. Do you agree? Why or why not?
Yes, I agree that the clash between Augustus and Beamish represents a conflict between the idealistic and the realistic. Augustus embodies idealism, believing in the nobility of his actions and the glory of the war effort, without fully understanding the complexities and consequences of war. He is driven by naive patriotism and a desire for personal recognition.
Beamish, on the other hand, represents realism. He is more cynical and aware of the inefficiencies and absurdities surrounding the war effort and the government system. He is skeptical of the idealistic notions that Augustus holds, and his attitude reflects a more practical, though disillusioned, understanding of the situation.
0 Comments